Legal Opinion

Osmundson v. Moore Mercantile Co.

Montana Supreme Court

Decided May 19, 1924No. 5,457PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Cooper

The record shows that P. H. Samuell, the original plaintiff in this action, sold and assigned the cause of action to Hazel *459Samuell Osmundson before the commencement of the trial, and in this court she was substituted on motion as appellant. It also discloses that the action was dismissed against the sheriff of Fergus county and the Moore Mercantile Company, leaving the Power Mercantile Company as the sole remaining defendant.

Six witnesses were sworn and testified orally, and the evidence of P. H. Samuell given upon a former trial was read to the jury in plaintiff’s behalf. Four witnesses…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State v. PhillipsMontana Supreme Court · 1907
  2. Carpenter v. EwingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
  3. Ross v. Kay Copper Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1919
  4. State v. GillMontana Supreme Court · 1898
  5. Martin v. City of ButteMontana Supreme Court · 1906

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. Wong SunMontana Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Aquettaz v. Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific Railway Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1937
  3. State v. Van HorneNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API