Legal Opinion

State v. Van Horne

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided December 1, 1941No. File 6796Published

1Per curiam

(on petition for rehearing). Appellants have petitioned for a rehearing. They contend that this court has overlooked “the fact that the trial court misinstructed upon questions of law that were controlling and bore directly upon the issues framed by the pleadings;” and they assert that the rule stated in ¶ 3 of the syllabus, that absent request for an appropriate instruction “failure to instruct can be urged as error only if in light of the evidence the non-direction constitutes misdirection,” is erroneous.

The questions thus presented by the petition for a rehearing were raised and argued…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Erickson v. WiperNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1916
  2. Hamlin v. Pacific Electric Ry. Co.California Supreme Court · 1907
  3. State v. GlassNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1915
  4. Giles v. TernesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1914
  5. Naylor v. MinockMichigan Supreme Court · 1893

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API