Legal Opinion

State v. Gill

Montana Supreme Court

Decided May 23, 1898PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from District Court, Madison County; M II. Darker, Judge. Harry Gill and four others were convicted of robbery, and they appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtPemberton, C. J.

The appellants were tried and convicted in the district court of Madison county of the crime of robbery, and from the judgment of conviction this appeal is prosecuted.

Counsel for the appellants contends that the information is fatally defective, in that it does not state facts sufficient to constitute a public offense.

The information charges that the crime of robbery was committed by the appellants as follows: “That the said Harry Gill, George Ogilvie, James Layhay, William Benoit, and Charles Truby, on the 13th day of November, A. D. eighteen hundred and ninety-seven, at the county of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. BloorMontana Supreme Court · 1898
  2. In re Disbarment of BloorMontana Supreme Court · 1898

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. HowardMontana Supreme Court · 1904
  2. State v. Wong SunMontana Supreme Court · 1943
  3. State v. PhillipsMontana Supreme Court · 1907
  4. State v. MasonMontana Supreme Court · 1900
  5. Aquettaz v. Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific Railway Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1937

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API