Legal Opinion

Judd v. Judd

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 21, 1916No. Docket No. 59PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Appeal from the superior court of Grand Rapids; Stuart, J. Bill by George H. Judd against Peternella Judd and another for the cancellation of certain conveyances, for an accounting, and for other relief. From' a decree for complainant, both parties appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtBird, J.

While George and Peternella Judd were husband and wife, he deeded to her certain real estate in the city of Grand Rapids. Subsequently, on account of ill health, he went to Florida, and there engaged in business. While there, defendant Peternella sought and obtained a divorce from him in the Grand Rapids courts. In the divorce case no alimony was asked or granted. Later complainant returned to Grand Rapids, and instituted these proceedings, praying for a cancellation of the conveyances, for an injunction restraining her from disposing of the property, and for an accounting of her management…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Thomas v. ThomasSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
  2. Jackson v. ClevelandMichigan Supreme Court · 1866
  3. Wipfler v. WipflerMichigan Supreme Court · 1908
  4. Meldrum v. MeldrumSupreme Court of Colorado · 1890
  5. Witbeck v. WitbeckMichigan Supreme Court · 1872

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Stephenson v. GoldenMichigan Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Samuel D Begola Services, Inc. v. Wild Bros.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1995
  3. McIntyre v. McIntyreMichigan Supreme Court · 1919
  4. Smith v. SmithMichigan Supreme Court · 1921
  5. Stephenson v. GoldenMichigan Supreme Court · 1937

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API