Legal Opinion

Municipality of Anchorage v. Sisters of Providence in Washington, Inc.

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided May 8, 1981No. 5017, 5018 and 5329PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Before RABINOWITZ, C. J., CONNOR, BURKE and MATTHEWS, JJ., and DIMOND, Senior Justice. RABINOWITZ, Chief Justice.

This appeal involves monies which were paid by the state to the Municipality of Anchorage pursuant to municipal revenue sharing statutes enacted in 1973. The funds in controversy were received by the Municipality under the provisions of former AS 43.18.010(h)(1) 1 and were generated by the Municipality’s inclusion of the hospital operated by Sisters of Providence in Washington, Inc. (“Providence”) in its annual revenue sharing applications for fiscal years 1974-76. During…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  2. Moore v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Malvo Ex Rel. Malvo v. J. C. Penney Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 1973
  4. Isakson v. RickeyAlaska Supreme Court · 1976
  5. Jager v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1975

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Dura Corp. v. HarnedAlaska Supreme Court · 1985
  2. International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Local 1357 v. Hawaiian Telephone Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Kodiak Electric Ass'n v. Delaval Turbine, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1984
  4. University of Alaska v. GeistautsAlaska Supreme Court · 1983
  5. In Re Appeals of Shantee Point, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2002

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API