United States v. Stookey
U.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review
1Opinion of the Court
ABERNATHY, Senior Judge:
Appellant has assigned two errors for our consideration:
I
SPECIFICATION 8 OF CHARGE I, WRONGFUL POSSESSION OF MARIJUANA, DUPLICATED THE ALLEGATION OF WRONGFULL USE OF MARIJUANA IN SPECIFICATION 7 OF CHARGE I. UNITED STATES V. ROMAN-L UCl ANO, 13 M.J. 490 (CMA 1982); UNITED STATES V. STURDI-VANT, 13 M.J. 323 (CMA 1982).
II
SPECIFICATION 19 AND 20 OF CHARGE I (WRONGFULL USE AND POSSESSION OF MARIJUANA) ESSENTIALLY DUPLICATE THE ALLEGATION OF UNLAWFUL TRANSFER OF MARIJUANA IN SPECIFICATION 19 OF CHARGE I. (Citations omitted)
We do not believe that the evils noted in United…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- United States v. TrottierUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1980
- United States v. SturdivantUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1982
- United States v. LabellaU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1982
3Cited by3 opinions
- United States v. SawinskiUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1983
- United States v. LabellaU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1982
- United States v. GeorgeU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1982