Legal Opinion

United States v. Labella

U.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review

Decided November 4, 1982No. Miscellaneous Docket Nos. 82-11 and 82-13PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT ON PETITION FOR EXTRAORDINARY RELIEF IN THE NATURE OF A WRIT OF MANDAMUS

ABERNATHY, Senior Judge:

We have consolidated these cases for decision since the operative facts and the legal issues arising therefrom are substantially identical. Further, the facts in these cases differ from those in United States v. Labella, 14 M.J. 688 (N.M.C.M.R.1982), only in that both of the subject accused were petty officers, and were not in a leave status at the time of the alleged offenses; further, certain of the events in question took place at the home of the accused, McIntosh.

Petitioner…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States v. TrottierUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1980
  2. United States v. CastlemanU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1981
  3. United States v. LabellaU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1982
  4. United States v. StookeyU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1982

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. United States v. LabellaUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API