Legal Opinion

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. William J. MAYERS and Patricia Mayers, Defendants-Appellants

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided April 5, 1990No. 88-3473PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Per curiam

This case raises the question of whether civil penalties assessed against defendants would make some or all of the criminal convictions here appealed a violation of the Double Jeopardy Clause of the Constitution under the recent case of United States v. Haler, 490 U.S. -, 109 S.Ct. 1892, 104 L.Ed.2d 487 (1989).

Defendants Dr. William J. Mayers and Patricia Mayers, a chiropractor and his wife, who operated a number of health care clinics, appeal their convictions on multiple charges arising from their having defrauded the Medicare program, the Civilian Health and Medical Program of the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. United States v. HalperSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. William J. MAYERS, D.C. and Patricia M. Mayers, Petitioners, v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, RespondentCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1986

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. United States v. Maximiliano Sanchez-Escareno, Adolpho Ayala Sanchez and David Garcia LopezCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1991
  2. United States v. RogersCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1992
  3. United States v. Michael G. MorganCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
  4. United States v. Hilda Amiel, Kathryn Amiel, Joanne Amiel, and Sarina AmielCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993
  5. United States v. Larry D. BarnetteCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1994

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API