Legal Opinion · Dissent

Caylor v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided August 14, 1962No. 42,469Published

1DissentWertz, J.

I am unable to agree with the majority of the court, and I will attempt to set forth my views on the question concerning which I differ.

The cataclysmic import of the majority opinion is to require of jurors fairness without thought and decision without discussion. The majority of this court has now decided that the only way to obtain a fair verdict — in personal injury cases — is to compel jurors to ponder pain and suffering in a vacuum within the jury room waiting until lightning strikes and something is hatched from nothing.

Defendants (appellants) contend it is reversible error for an…

2Cases cited46 opinions

  1. Botta v. BrunnerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1958
  2. Seffert v. Los Angeles Transit LinesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Henne v. BalickSupreme Court of Delaware · 1958
  4. Imperial Oil, Limited v. Frank DrlikCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1956
  5. Caley v. ManickeIllinois Supreme Court · 1962

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API