Legal Opinion

Barrows v. Kenosha County

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided March 5, 1957PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSteinle, J.

Condemnation statutes are in derogation of the common law and must be strictly construed. Union Mfg. Co. v. Spies (1923), 181 Wis. 497, 195 N. W. 326.

Ch. 32 of the revised statutes treats with procedure in eminent domain. Nowhere in that legislation is authority conferred upon this court to entertain an appeal 'taken prior to the making of an award by commissioners appointed for such purpose.

Until the commissioners have made an award, a proceeding under ch. 32, Stats., is not of a judicial nature, the judge merely acting in an administrative capacity. Klump v. Cybulski (1957), 274 Wis. 604,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Klump v. CybulskiWisconsin Supreme Court · 1957
  2. Skalicky v. Friendship Electric Light & Power Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1927
  3. Manns v. Marinette & Menominee Paper Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1931
  4. Puffer v. WelchWisconsin Supreme Court · 1910
  5. State Ex Rel. Wisconsin State Department of Agriculture v. AaronsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1946

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. City of Madison v. TiedemanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1957
  2. Schroedel Corp. v. State Highway CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
  3. Acheson v. Winnebago County Highway CommitteeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1961
  4. Kultgen v. MuellerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1958
  5. Heidersdorf v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1958

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API