Legal Opinion

Skalicky v. Friendship Electric Light & Power Co.

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided June 20, 1927PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEschweiler, J.

The appellant company contends that upon the appeal taken by the petitioners from the award of the commissioners there must be a trial de novo in the circuit court of all the issues presented by the petition and the answer. The respondents contend that the company, having failed to file exceptions to the findings made in the first hearing wherein commissioners were appointed and having failed to appeal from the order therein, is conclusively bound by the result of the preliminary hearing and that no question *399is or can be presented on appeal other than the amount of damages for the taking. The…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Milwaukee Light, Heat & Traction Co. v. Ela Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1910
  2. Janesville Cotton Mills v. FordWisconsin Supreme Court · 1892
  3. Walton v. Green Bay, Winona & St. Paul RailroadWisconsin Supreme Court · 1888
  4. Wooster v. Sugar River Valley RailroadWisconsin Supreme Court · 1883
  5. Hemmis v. Consolidated Water Power & Paper Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1921

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Falkner v. Northern States Power Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Hasslinger v. Village of HartlandWisconsin Supreme Court · 1940
  3. United States v. Chicago, B. & Q. R. Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1937
  4. Klump v. CybulskiWisconsin Supreme Court · 1957
  5. Mohr v. Iowa State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of Iowa · 1963

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API