Legal Opinion

City of Madison v. Tiedeman

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided June 4, 1957PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSteinle, J.

The questions presented pertain not only to the grounds of the demurrer, but also to a consideration as to whether the demurrer was a proper pleading to the condem nation petition, and if so, as to whether the order overruling the demurrer was appealable. Since we are obliged to determine that a demurrer to a condemnation petition is not a proper pleading, it is beyond our province to decide the other considerations that have been raised.

The several steps to be employed in a condemnation proceeding are prescribed in ch. 32, Stats. Sec. 32.04, Stats., provides for the presentation of a…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Klump v. CybulskiWisconsin Supreme Court · 1957
  2. Skalicky v. Friendship Electric Light & Power Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1927
  3. Manns v. Marinette & Menominee Paper Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1931
  4. Puffer v. WelchWisconsin Supreme Court · 1910
  5. Tobin v. Willow River Power Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1932

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Village of Shorewood v. SteinbergWisconsin Supreme Court · 1993
  2. 519 CORP. v. Department of TransportationWisconsin Supreme Court · 1979
  3. State Department of Transportation v. PetersonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Warehouse II, LLC v. State Department of TransportationWisconsin Supreme Court · 2006
  5. Fontaine v. Milwaukee County Expressway CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1966

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API