City of Madison v. Tiedeman
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtSteinle, J.
The questions presented pertain not only to the grounds of the demurrer, but also to a consideration as to whether the demurrer was a proper pleading to the condem nation petition, and if so, as to whether the order overruling the demurrer was appealable. Since we are obliged to determine that a demurrer to a condemnation petition is not a proper pleading, it is beyond our province to decide the other considerations that have been raised.
The several steps to be employed in a condemnation proceeding are prescribed in ch. 32, Stats. Sec. 32.04, Stats., provides for the presentation of a…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Klump v. CybulskiWisconsin Supreme Court · 1957
- Skalicky v. Friendship Electric Light & Power Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1927
- Manns v. Marinette & Menominee Paper Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1931
- Puffer v. WelchWisconsin Supreme Court · 1910
- Tobin v. Willow River Power Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1932
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Village of Shorewood v. SteinbergWisconsin Supreme Court · 1993
- 519 CORP. v. Department of TransportationWisconsin Supreme Court · 1979
- State Department of Transportation v. PetersonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1999
- Warehouse II, LLC v. State Department of TransportationWisconsin Supreme Court · 2006
- Fontaine v. Milwaukee County Expressway CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.