Legal Opinion
Hartman v. Wood
South Dakota Supreme Court
Decided March 8, 1989No. 16225PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MILLER, Justice.
ACTION
Gene Hartman and C.E. Pahl (Hartman) appeal a summary judgment granted in favor of Wallace and Wiky Wood (Woods) in Hartman’s action for specific performance of a contract for deed. Hartman also appeals an award of attorney’s fees to Woods. Woods have made a motion for attorney’s fees on appeal. We affirm in part and reverse and remand in part. Woods’ motion for appellate attorney’s fees is denied.
FACTS
In 1976 Woods entered into a contract for deed for the sale of a parcel of real property to Vernon Garrett Ranch, Inc. (Garrett). The contract required Woods to deliver…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Western United Realty, Inc. v. IsaacsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1984
- Bego v. GordonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1987
- Board of County Commissioners v. AuslaenderSupreme Court of Colorado · 1987
- Lowe v. Steele Construction Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
- Kallstrom v. Marshall Beverages, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1986
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Ridley v. Lawrence County CommissionSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
- Michlitsch v. MeyerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
- Estate of Fisher v. FisherSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
- Johnson v. MillerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2012
- Hoffman v. OlsenSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.