Legal Opinion

Hoffman v. Olsen

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided March 5, 2003No. NonePublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Per curiam

[¶ 1.] Charles Hoffman, doing business as Customer Services, LLC, (hereinafter Hoffman) appeals the trial court’s denial of attorney’s fees in this mechanics’ lien foreclosure action and also claims that the trial court improperly reduced the amount owing for the services performed. By notice of review, Ray Olsen asserts that the trial court erred in awarding any amount to Hoffman.

FACTS AND PROCEDURE

[¶ 2.] Olsen hired Marcy Barber to make improvements to his ranch property. Specifically, he hired her to install tin siding on a granary and fuel shed, using hail-damaged tin that had previously…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. City of Deadwood v. Summit, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Matter of Estate of O'KeefeSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Rusch v. KaukerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Ridley v. Lawrence County CommissionSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Michlitsch v. MeyerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Crisman v. Determan Chiropractic, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Duffy v. Circuit Court for the Seventh Judicial CircuitSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Toft v. ToftSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Wald, Inc. v. StanleySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
  5. Smetana v. SmetanaSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2007

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API