Federal Trade Commission v. Staples, Inc.
District Court, District of Columbia
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Emmet G. Sullivan, United States District Judge
I. Introduction
Drawing an analogy to the fate of penguins whose destinies appear doomed in the face of uncertain environmental changes; Defendant. Staples Inc. (“Staples”) and Defendant Office Depot, Inc. (“Office Depot”) (collectively “Defendants”) argue they are like “penguins on a melting iceberg,” struggling to survive in an increasingly digitized world and an office-supply industry soon to be revolutionized by new entrants like Amazon Business, Prelim. Inj. Hrg Tr. (“Hrg Tr.”) 60:15 (Opening Statement of Diane Sullivan,…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- United States v. Grinnell Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Brown Shoe Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- United States v. Marine Bancorporation, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
- United States v. General Dynamics Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
- United States v. Citizens & Southern National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Federal Trade Commission v. Advocate Health Care NetworkCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2016
- United States of America v. Aetna Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2017
- United States of America v. Anthem, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2017
- United States v. AT & T Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
- Intellectual Ventures I LLC v. Capital One Financial Corp.District Court, D. Maryland · 2017
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.