Legal Opinion

Goldberg v. Grossman and Rosenau

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 16, 1931No. Appeal 135PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Baldbige, J.,

On December 22, 1925, the defendant’s straw man. Edward Woodfield, as equitable owner, entered into an agreement to sell the premises, known as 411 Market Street, Philadelphia, for $72,000. Settlement was to be had on March 1, 1926, and possession was to be given by assignment of “present existing leases.” When the agreement of sale was executed, the first floor was in possession of Philip Felderman and Louis Lerner under a lease, dated October 17, 1925, for a term of five years, which provided that the premises should not be sub-let or the lease assigned. Prior to…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Kerr v. DaySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1850
  2. Ralph v. DeileySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
  3. Spratt v. GreenfieldSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
  4. Medoff v. VandersaalSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1921
  5. Leafgreen v. Drake's Exrs.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Thomas v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1974
  2. B. C. & H. Corp. v. Acme Markets, Inc., Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Somerset County1980
  3. Pittston Township Auditors, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Luzerne County1949

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API