Legal Opinion

Moore v. Ross

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 20, 1894No. 17,034PublishedCited by 5 opinions

From the Madison Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtMcCabe, J.

This suit was brought by the appellant against the appellees, to recover possession of a part of a lot in the town of Alexandria, in Madison county. The issues formed were such as to present the question on the trial thereof, whether the action was barred by the third subdivision of section 294, Burns R. S. 1894 (R. S. 1881, section 293), or not. So much of the section as is applicable reads as follows: “The following actions shall be commenced within the periods herein prescribed, after the cause of action has accrued, and not afterward. * * *

Third. For the recovery of real property sold on…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Walker v. HillIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  2. Vancleave v. MillikenIndiana Supreme Court · 1859
  3. Second National Bank v. CoreyIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  4. Brown v. MaherIndiana Supreme Court · 1879
  5. Sedwick v. RitterIndiana Supreme Court · 1891

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Sinclair v. GunzenhauserIndiana Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Armstrong v. HuftyIndiana Supreme Court · 1899
  3. Goslen v. Waddell Inv. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
  4. Stratford Co. v. Continental Mortgage Co.California Court of Appeal · 1925
  5. Frankel v. VossIndiana Court of Appeals · 1915

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API