Legal Opinion

Stratford Co. v. Continental Mortgage Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 13, 1925No. Docket No. 5087PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWorks, J.

In its inception this action was one in unlawful detainer for nonpayment of rent. The complexion of the litigation, however, was materially changed by the filing, pursuant to an order of the trial court, of an amendment to the complaint to conform to the proof. We shall lay aside a contention of respondents that the court was without power to permit the filing of the amendment and shall proceed to a discussion of the merits of the question which appellant seeks to present. The judgment was in form in favor of plaintiff, but as the court refused to award it the full measure of relief for which…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Quatman v. McCrayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
  2. Strange v. Board of CommissionersIndiana Supreme Court · 1910
  3. Jameson v. Chanslor-Canfield Midway Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 1917
  4. Norton v. ReardonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1903
  5. Randol v. ScottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Burns v. McGrawCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
  2. Joost v. CastelCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
  3. Safeway Stores, Inc. v. BuhlingerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
  4. Horning v. LaddCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
  5. Miller v. San Francisco Newspaper AgencyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API