Legal Opinion

Gemberling v. Heitman

Washington Supreme Court

Decided August 21, 1936No. 26176. Department OnePublished

1Opinion of the CourtSteinert, J.

Plaintiffs brought this action against defendants for an accounting of insurance premiums alleged to be due them, for damages resulting from the loss of such premiums, and for an injunction to restrain defendants from further violating a contract between the parties respecting’ an insurance agency business. Defendant Heitman cross-complained against plaintiff Gemberling upon an assigned claim for moneys alleged to have been misappropriated by Gemberling from funds belonging to defendant Fidelity Bent & Collection Company.

Upon a trial by the court, findings and conclusions were made, and,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Garofalo v. CommelliniWashington Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Williams v. BevisWashington Supreme Court · 1929
  3. Ulrich v. StephensWashington Supreme Court · 1908
  4. Zindorf v. Western American Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1901
  5. Farmers' Warehouse Co. v. FryWashington Supreme Court · 1935

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API