Legal Opinion

Williams v. Bevis

Washington Supreme Court

Decided June 6, 1929No. 21704. Department OnePublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBeals, J.

In his complaint plaintiff alleges the execution of the following agreement by defendant on the one part and the firm of which he was a member on the other, the execution of the agreement being admitted:

“This agreement made this 1st day of March, 1917, by and between May P. Bevis, party of the first part, and Crandell, Williams and Crandell, attorneys, parties of the second part, Witnesseth:—
“Whereas one, H. J. Hibschmann as trustee in bankruptcy for M. L. and L. G-. Bevis, has instituted suit in the superior court for Spokane county, Washington, against Clifford D. Bevis, et al., being case…

2Cited by8 opinions

  1. High v. HighWashington Supreme Court · 1953
  2. Mertens v. MertensWashington Supreme Court · 1951
  3. Esakovich, Exrs. v. GroudineSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
  4. Hansen v. WalkerWashington Supreme Court · 1955
  5. City of Tacoma v. WILLIAM ROGERS COMPANYWashington Supreme Court · 2003

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API