Legal Opinion

Garofalo v. Commellini

Washington Supreme Court

Decided August 16, 1932No. 23827. Department TwoPublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMillard, J.

A few days subsequent to Albert Commellini’s purchase of a garage business in Spokane, Peter Garofalo bought a one-half interest therein. Approximately six weeks later, Garofalo sold, for less than he paid therefor, his interest in the business to James J. Baroni. Within twenty-four hours, Garofalo, claiming Baroni acted for Commellini, tendered to Baroni the consideration paid and demanded return of the bill of sale. Garofalo’s endeavor to restore the status quo ante failed.

Three months thereafter, Garofalo and wife, alleging they had been defrauded by the misrepresentations of Commellini,…

2Cited by9 opinions

  1. Frank Coluccio Construction Co. v. King CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2007
  2. Bale v. AllisonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2013
  3. Buck Mountain Owners' Ass'n v. PrestwichCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2013
  4. Bird v. BEST PLUMBING GROUP, LLCCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2011
  5. Buck Mountain Owners' Association, Res. v. Glenn Prestwich And Barbara Bentley, Apps.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2013

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API