Legal Opinion

Saint Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Co. v. Central National Insurance Co. of Omaha

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided February 4, 1992No. C0-91-1368PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DAVIES, Judge.

Appellant Central National Insurance Company of Omaha (CNICO) argues the trial court erred in ruling that, (1) CNICO was collaterally estopped from challenging its liability to respondent St. Paul Fire & Marine on a payment bond for debts arising from the default of CNICO’s assured, (2) CNICO’s payment bond is subject to the limitation period in Minn.Stat. § 574.31 rather than the limitation contained in the bond, (3) St. Paul Fire & Marine is not barred from raising this claim by the doctrine of res judicata, (4) St. Paul Fire & Marine is entitled to indemnification from…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Offerdahl v. University of Minnesota Hospitals & ClinicsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
  2. Grondahl v. BulluckSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
  3. Kaiser v. Northern States Power Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
  4. Johnson v. Consolidated Freightways, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
  5. McMenomy v. RydenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1967

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Deli v. HasselmoCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1996
  2. Johnson v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API