Legal Opinion
City of Lakin v. Kansas Security Board of Review
Court of Appeals of Kansas
Decided December 30, 1993No. 69,440PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Elliott, J.:
The City of Lakin appeals the district court’s affirmance of the administrative tribunal’s findings that Ronald L. Vanover was entitled to unemployment benefits.
We affirm.
The facts are not in dispute. Vanover was employed by the City of Lakin from June 3, 1991, through September 20, 1991. Vanover was then employed at a local business for a short period of time, after which he filed a claim for unemployment benefits. Vanover’s position with Lakin was known by him to be for a short period of time.
The Kansas Department of Human Resources (KDHR) examiner ruled Vanover to be eligible…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Amoco Production Co. v. Armold, Director of TaxationSupreme Court of Kansas · 1974
- Smith v. MarshallSupreme Court of Kansas · 1978
- Clark v. Board of Review of the Employment Security Division of the Labor DepartmentSupreme Court of Kansas · 1961
- Wailuku Sugar Co. v. AgsaludHawaii Supreme Court · 1982
- Loftis v. Legionville School Safety Patrol Training Center, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Miller v. Board of Trustees Public Employees Retirement SystemCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1995
- Chauncey F. Hutter, Inc. v. Virginia Employment CommissionCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2007
- Baldwin v. Hays Asphalt Construction, Inc.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 1995
- Kansas ex rel. Gordon v. Oliver (In re Oliver)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Kansas · 2016
- Keithley v. Kansas Employment Security Board of ReviewCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1997
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.