Legal Opinion

Chauncey F. Hutter, Inc. v. Virginia Employment Commission

Court of Appeals of Virginia

Decided November 6, 2007No. Record 0537-07-2PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JAMES W. HALEY, JR., Judge.

Code § 60.2-618(1) states, in part, that “[a]n individual shall be disqualified for benefits ... if the Commission finds such individual is unemployed because he left work voluntarily.” The issue here for determination, apparently one of first impression before a Virginia court, is whether an individual who enters into an employment contract for a specific term leaves employment “voluntarily” when that term expires. We conclude such an individual does not, and, accordingly, is entitled to unemployment benefits.

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

The facts are undisputed.

Char…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Marbury v. MadisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1803
  2. Personnel Administrator of Mass. v. FeeneySupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Boynton v. KilgoreSupreme Court of Virginia · 2006
  4. Branch v. Virginia Employment Commission & Virginia Chemical Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1978
  5. Chase v. DaimlerChrysler Corp.Supreme Court of Virginia · 2003

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Blue v. Department of LaborSupreme Court of Vermont · 2011
  2. Gordon v. Ford Motor Co.Court of Appeals of Virginia · 2009
  3. Roanoke Ambulatory Surgery Center v. Bimbo Bakeries USA, Inc.Court of Appeals of Virginia · 2019
  4. Blue v. Dept. of Labor and Hickok & Boardman Realty, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2011
  5. Gordon v. Ford Motor Co.Court of Appeals of Virginia · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API