Legal Opinion
In Re: Van Os
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided January 3, 2017No. 2015-1975PublishedCited by 37 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion concurring in part and dissenting in part filed by Circuit Judge NEWMAN.
*1360MOORE, Circuit Judge.
Appellants Marcel Van Os and other inventors at Apple Inc. (collectively, “Van Os”) appeal from a decision of the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (“Board”) affirming the examiner’s rejection of claims 38-41 of U.S. Patent Application No. 12/364,-470 (“the ’470 application”). For the reasons discussed below, we vacate and remand.
BACKGROUND
The ’470 application is directed to a touchscreen interface in a portable electronic device that allows a user to rearrange icons. Claims 38 and 40, the only…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- KSR International Co. v. Teleflex Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
- In Re Sang-Su LeeCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002
- Belden Inc. v. Berk-Tek LLCCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2015
- In Re: Nuvasive, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2016
- Dystar Textilfarben Gmbh & Co Deutschland Kg v. C.H. Patrick, Co.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- Metalcraft of Mayville, Inc. v. the Toro CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2017
- Icon Health and Fitness, Inc. v. Strava, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2017
- Ultratec, Inc. v. Captioncall, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2017
- Rovalma, S.A. v. Bohler-Edelstahl Gmbh & Co. KgCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2017
- Adapt Pharma Operations v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2022
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.