Legal Opinion
State Ex Rel. Badgett v. Mullen
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided May 8, 2008No. 06CA61PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Harsha, Judge.
{¶ 1} Relator James M. Badgett filed a taxpayer mandamus action under R.C. 733.58 and 733.59 against the city of Marietta, the mayor of Marietta, the president of the Marietta City Council, and the members of the Marietta City Council (“the city”) alleging that they have not provided “suitable accommodations” for the Marietta Municipal Court as required by R.C. 1901.36. The city contends that Badgett does not have standing to bring this action, because he is not a judge, clerk, or other employee of the municipal court. We disagree because there is no statutory language or case…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Cline v. Ohio Bureau of Motor VehiclesOhio Supreme Court · 1991
- Ohio Contractors Ass'n v. BickingOhio Supreme Court · 1994
- Donnelly v. City of Fairview ParkOhio Supreme Court · 1968
- State ex rel. Neff v. CorriganOhio Supreme Court · 1996
- Connin v. BaileyOhio Supreme Court · 1984
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Judges of Toledo Municipal Court v. Mayor of ToledoOhio Court of Appeals · 2008
- State ex rel. Badgett v. MullensOhio Supreme Court · 2008
- State ex rel. McKernan v. Seven Hills City CouncilOhio Court of Appeals · 2018