Schwartzmiller v. State
Idaho Court of Appeals
1Per curiam
Dean Arthur Schwartzmiller appeals from denial of an application under I.C. § 19-4901 for post-conviction relief. After an evidentiary hearing, the district court concluded that Schwartzmiller’s constitutional rights to a fair trial and to compulsory process for the attendance of witnesses on his behalf were not impermissibly abridged during his trial on charges of lewd and lascivious conduct with a minor. Schwartzmiller asserts on appeal the district court erred in its findings of fact and conclusions of law. We affirm the order denying relief.
Compulsory process and due process rights…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- United States v. AgursSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Washington v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Lisenba v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- United States v. Valenzuela-BernalSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- McKinney v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 1999
- State v. GarzaIdaho Court of Appeals · 1985
- State v. TOMAS D.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
- State v. SimonsIdaho Court of Appeals · 1987
- State v. MasonIdaho Court of Appeals · 1986
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.