State v. Garza
Idaho Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
BURNETT, Judge.
Ausencio Garza stands convicted by a jury of delivering a controlled substance (heroin). He is serving a fixed sentence of ten years. On appeal he contends (1) that he was improperly bound over to the district court for trial; (2) that his right to compulsory process for obtaining witnesses was violated; (3) that a motion in limine, seeking to prevent impeachment by evidence of a prior felony if he testified, was erroneously denied; (4) that expert testimony identifying the controlled substance should have been excluded; and (5) that the sentence was unduly harsh. We affirm the…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Washington v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Luce v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- State v. ToohillIdaho Court of Appeals · 1982
- State v. MitchellIdaho Supreme Court · 1983
- State v. McClureOregon Supreme Court · 1984
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- State v. BrownWashington Supreme Court · 1988
- State v. BrownWashington Supreme Court · 1990
- People v. CollinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1986
- State v. WhiteheadSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1986
- State of Iowa v. Justin Robert DerbySupreme Court of Iowa · 2011
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.