Legal Opinion
Heyen v. State
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided October 28, 2010No. 84A04-1002-CR-134PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
RILEY, Judge.
STATEMENT OF THE CASE
Appellant-Defendant, Kelvin Heyen (Heyen), appeals his conviction for dealing in methamphetamine, a Class B felony, Ind.Code § 35-48-4-1.1 and for being an habitual offender, L.C. § 35-50-2-8.
We affirm.
ISSUES
Heyen raises five issues for our review, which we restate as the following six:(1) Whether the trial court abused its discretion in admitting certain evidence;(2) Whether the trial court erred in denying his motion at trial to reveal the identity of the confidential informant;(38) Whether the evidence was sufficient to convict Heyen of dealing in…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Roviaro v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Cardwell v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2008
- Anglemyer v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2007
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Bobby A. Harlan v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2012
- Rogers v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2011
- Butler v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2011
- Schmidt v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2011
- Ivan Cornel Augustin Hendrickson, Jr. v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)Indiana Court of Appeals · 2020
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.