Legal Opinion

Cardwell v. State

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 12, 2008No. 10S05-0811-CR-588PublishedCited by 1,320 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BOEHM, Justice.

Rudy Wayne Cardwell challenges the appropriateness of his sentence under Indiana Rule of Appellate Procedure 7(B). Concluding that Cardwell’s aggregate sentence of thirty-four years is inappropriate in light of the nature of his offense and his character, we revise his sentence to consecutive terms of nine and eight years for an aggregate sentence of seventeen years.

Facts and Procedural History

In September 2005, Cardwell lived in Jeffersonville, Indiana with his girlfriend, Star Gentry, Gentry’s three-year-old daughter, S.G., and H.G., the couple’s one-year-old daughter.…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Gall v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Anglemyer v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Childress v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Serino v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2003
  5. Lopez v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1988

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1,320 opinions

  1. Charles Stephenson v. State of IndianaIndiana Supreme Court · 2015
  2. Andrew Conley v. State of IndianaIndiana Supreme Court · 2012
  3. Randy L. Knapp v. State of IndianaIndiana Supreme Court · 2014
  4. Curtis A. Bethea v. State of IndianaIndiana Supreme Court · 2013
  5. Michael Chambers v. State of IndianaIndiana Supreme Court · 2013

1,315 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API