Legal Opinion

Jorgensen v. Coppedge

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided January 27, 2010No. 35575PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

J. JONES, Justice.

The Coppedges appeal the district court’s order denying attorney fees. We affirm.

I

This case is before the Court for a second time following our opinion in Jorgensen v. Coppedge, 145 Idaho 524, 181 P.3d 450 (2008). In the first case, Jorgensen brought an action against the Coppedges for breach of contract, breach of an implied contract, unjust enrichment, and quantum meruit. Id. at 526, 181 P.3d at 452. The Coppedges answered and filed a counterclaim seeking damages for fraud, breach of contract, unfair competition, and intentional interference with a prospective business…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Eighteen Mile Ranch, LLC v. Nord Excavating & Paving, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Jorgensen v. CoppedgeIdaho Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Ross v. Coleman Co., Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Shore v. PetersonIdaho Supreme Court · 2009
  5. Payne v. FoleyIdaho Supreme Court · 1982

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Oakes v. Boise Heart Clinic Physicians, PLLCIdaho Supreme Court · 2012
  2. City of Middleton v. Coleman Homes, LLCIdaho Supreme Court · 2018
  3. Wandering Trails, LLC v. Big Bite Excavation, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 2014
  4. Credit Suisse AG v. Teufel Nursery, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 2014
  5. Goodspeed v. ShippenIdaho Supreme Court · 2013

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API