Legal Opinion

Nelson v. Fightmaster

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided February 13, 1896PublishedCited by 22 opinions

Error from the District Court of Oklahoma Comity.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Bueeoed, J.:

The only question presented by the record in this case is as to the proper interpretation of our exemption laws.

The plaintiff in error was the head of a family and a resident householder of Oklahoma county at the time of bringing this action. He was the owner of certain personal property which was levied upon by the sheriff to satisfy an execution issued out of the probate court of said county. Plaintiff claimed certain property as exempt, and began his action by injunction in the district court to restrain the sale of such property. The…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Berg v. BaldwinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1884
  2. Dow v. SmithSupreme Court of Vermont · 1835
  3. Mallory v. BerrySupreme Court of Kansas · 1876
  4. Freeman v. CarpenterSupreme Court of Vermont · 1838
  5. Mundell v. HammondSupreme Court of Vermont · 1868

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Fisher v. Credithrift of America, Inc. (In Re Fisher)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1981
  2. In Re SimsUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 1999
  3. Japp v. Sapulpa State BankSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  4. Phelan v. LaceySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  5. In Re SiegmannSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1988

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API