Legal Opinion

Phelan v. Lacey

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided September 28, 1915No. 5257PublishedCited by 20 opinions

Error from County Court, Oklahoma County; John W. Hayson, Judge. Action by J. P. Phelan against Nicholas Lacey and another. Judgment for defendants, and plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

DUDLEY, C.

Plaintiff in error levied on 18 chickens and 35 ducks belonging to the defendants in error under an execution on a judgment against them in his favor. Their motion to quash the execution on the ground that the property seized was exempt was sustained. He saved exceptions and has brought the case here for review.

Defendants in error are husband and wife, and it is contended that the property seized is exempt to them if it comes within the purview of subdivision -15 of section 3342, Rev. Laws of 1910, on exemption, which is as follows :

“All provisions and forage on hand, or…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Nelson v. FightmasterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1896
  2. Ward v. GibbsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1895
  3. Cook v. FullerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  4. Atkinson v. GatcherSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1861

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Field v. GoatSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
  2. Fisher v. Credithrift of America, Inc. (In Re Fisher)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1981
  3. In Re SimsUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 1999
  4. Robinson v. Sanchez (In Re Robinson)Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Tenth Circuit · 2003
  5. In Re Allen's GuardianshipSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API