Kuzmen v. Kamien Et Ux.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by Hirt, J.,
These are appeals from the order of the Municipal Court of Philadelphia County vacating an award of arbitrators.
On November 7, 1937 plaintiff under a written con tract, completed repairs to a building owned by defendants, and upon tbeir refusal to pay the balance claimed to be due, brought an action in assumpsit. The defendants then entered a rule to stay proceedings pending submission to arbitrators, as provided in the written contract. 1 11 The court so ordered. Plaintiff thereupon named as his arbitrator B. J. Krakow and defendants named Louis Rosenberg. Rosenberg,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- National Transit Co. v. BoardmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
- Deibert to Use. v. RhodesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
- Nippon Ki-Ito Kaisha, Ltd. v. Ewing-Thomas Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
- J. M. Davis Co. v. Shaler TownshipSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
- Bartolett v. DixonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1873
3Cited by13 opinions
- Tyler v. KingSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
- Amalgamated Transit Union, Division 85 v. Port AuthoritySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
- Shapiro v. Keystone InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
- Schroeder Bros., Inc. v. SabelliSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
- DiFilippo v. BeckDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1983
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.