Legal Opinion

Lamb v. Lamb

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided February 27, 1905No. Docket No. 78PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Error to Calhoun; Hopkins, J. Ejectment by Charles R. Lamb against Sanford Lamb. There was judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtMontgomery, J.

This is an action of ejectment to recover a strip of land claimed by plaintiff to be a portion of his farm, adjoining defendant’s land; the defendant claiming that the land in dispute in fact belongs to his farm. The dispute is determined when the true boundary line is *168ascertained. The jury found for plaintiff, and defendant brings the case here; alleging error committed in rulings in relation to the admissibility of evidence, in the charge as given, and in the court’s refusal to direct a verdict.

The testimony shows that as early as 1859 to 1861 (the precise date is not fixed) the defendant…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Carpenter v. CarpenterMichigan Supreme Court · 1899
  2. Smith v. RunnellsMichigan Supreme Court · 1893
  3. Mette v. FeldmanMichigan Supreme Court · 1880

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Uker v. ThiemanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1906

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API