Legal Opinion
United States v. Doe
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Decided October 26, 2011No. 09-15869PublishedCited by 72 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MARCUS, Circuit Judge:
John Doe (“Doe”)1 appeals his convictions for aggravated identity theft, principally claiming the government did not produce sufficient evidence that Doe knew the name and social security number he used in applying for a United States passport belonged to an actual person. Doe also argues that a two-level obstruction-of-justice enhancement was erroneously applied to his sentence because the admittedly false statements he made during his pretrial services interview were not material, because he did not intend to obstruct justice, and because no finding was made that he…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Pennsylvania v. MunizSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Flores-Figueroa v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- United States v. MaxwellCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2009
- United States v. Pedro Cruz-Valdez, Reuben Martin-Gonzalez and Manuel Fortunado Ariza-FuentesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1985
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by72 opinions
- United States v. Anthony RobertsCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2015
- Edward Dell v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2013
- United States v. LebowitzCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2012
- United States v. Jean-Daniel PerkinsCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2015
- People v. PerezSupreme Court of Colorado · 2016
67 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.