Legal Opinion

Imperial Portrait Co. v. Bryan

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided June 7, 1900PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Certiorari. Before J. B. Park, judge pro hac vice. Greene superior court. August term, 1899.

1Opinion of the CourtLittle, J.

The plaintiff instituted an action in a justice’s court, to recover a judgment' against Bryan for a bill of goods amounting to $17.75. The defendant pleaded that goods similar to those named in the account attached to the summons were shipped to him, but they wholly failed to come up to samples and were immediately rejected by defendant and returned to plaintiff. The jury returned a verdict for the defendant. The plaintiff presented a petition for certiorari, which was sanctioned, and on the hearing was overruled, and the plaintiff excepted. The order for the goods was as follows:

“Imperial…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Aetna Chemical Co. v. Spaulding & Kimball Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1924
  2. Kiser Co. v. BrananCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1923
  3. Goldsmith & Co. v. Marcus & Bros.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1910
  4. Bernhard Stern & Sons, Inc. v. ChagnonSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1917

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API