Settco, LLC v. New York State Urban Development Corp.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
—Original proceeding pursuant to section 207 of the Eminent Domain Procedure Law challenging the findings and determination of respondents.
It is hereby ordered that the determination be and the same hereby is unanimously confirmed without costs and the petition is dismissed.
Memorandum: Petitioner commenced this original proceeding pursuant to EDPL 207 seeking review of respondents’ determination and findings that a “public use, benefit or purpose” (EDPL 204 [B] [1]) will be served by the proposed acquisition of petitioner’s property in downtown Niagara Falls for the site of a new convention…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Jackson v. New York State Urban Development Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1986
- Akpan v. KochNew York Court of Appeals · 1990
- Gernatt Asphalt Products, Inc. v. Town of SardiniaNew York Court of Appeals · 1996
- Waldo's, Inc. v. Village of Johnson CityNew York Court of Appeals · 1989
- Kaufmann's Carousel, Inc. v. City of Syracuse Industrial Development AgencyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Halperin v. City of New RochelleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- C/S 12th Avenue LLC v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- Village of Chestnut Ridge v. Town of RamapoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- Dunk v. City of WatertownAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- Custom Topsoil, Inc. v. City of BuffaloAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.