Legal Opinion
Jackson v. New York State Urban Development Corp.
New York Court of Appeals
Decided May 8, 1986PublishedCited by 498 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Kaye, J.
These cases, involving the State Environmental Quality *411Review Act (SEQRA) and the Eminent Domain Procedure Law (EDPL), challenge the plan of the New York State Urban Development Corporation (UDC) and its subsidiary (Times Square Redevelopment Corporation) to redevelop the Times Square area of Manhattan. According to UDC, the project represents an attempt to eliminate the persistent blight that has characterized the area and return it to productive use. Petitioners, who work or own buildings in the area or reside nearby, contend that UDC, in its eagerness to get…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Berman v. ParkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- Hawaii Housing Authority v. MidkiffSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Interstate Commerce Commission v. City of Jersey CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1944
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by498 opinions
- Society of Plastics Industry, Inc. v. County of SuffolkNew York Court of Appeals · 1991
- Halperin v. City of New RochelleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- Akpan v. KochNew York Court of Appeals · 1990
- Save the Pine Bush, Inc. v. City of AlbanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
- Gernatt Asphalt Products, Inc. v. Town of SardiniaNew York Court of Appeals · 1996
493 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.