Legal Opinion

Doe v. Legacy Broadcasting of Minnesota, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided August 24, 1993No. C1-93-377PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

NORTON, Judge.

The trial court entered a default judgment against appellant because he failed to answer respondent’s complaint in a timely fashion. Because we hold that respondent waived her objection to appellant’s late answer, we reverse.

FACTS

Respondent Mary Doe served a complaint upon appellant Christopher Tsipour-as on April 17, 1990. Respondent’s complaint alleged that Tsipouras and several other men sexually assaulted her in a hotel room on August 9, 1989. Appellant was incarcerated at the Minnesota Correctional Facility at Oak Park Heights when served.

Appellant failed to answer…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Smith v. MullikenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1858
  2. Bentley v. KralSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1947

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Complete Lawn Servs. v. Chimney Hill, L.L.C.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2016
  2. Stroud v. Hennepin County Medical CenterCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API