Legal Opinion

Peters v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided June 28, 1934No. A-8715PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChappell, J.

Plaintiff in error, hereinafter referred. to as defendant, was convicted in the county court of Kay county, of violation of article 3, chapter 24, Oklahoma Statutes 1931, as amended by chapter 60, Session Laws 1933, prohibiting the operation of barber shops or employment therein without first having submitted to a physical examination by the proper medical authorities, obtaining a license, and paying the fee fixed by said law, and his punishment fixed at a fine of $1 and the costs of the action.

In the county court a jury was waived and the cause submitted to the court on an agreed statement…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Barbier v. ConnollySupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  2. Burks v. WalkerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
  3. Cooper v. RollinsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1922
  4. Edwards v. ChildersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
  5. Ex parte LucasSupreme Court of Missouri · 1901

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Herrin v. ArnoldSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
  2. Ex Parte HerrinCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1939
  3. Mitchell v. WilliamsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1956
  4. Sheller v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1935
  5. Board of Barber Examiners v. ParkerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1938

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API