Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Herrin

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided August 4, 1939No. A-9583PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBarefoot, J.

This is an original application for a writ of habeas corpus upon the part of Dalton Herrin, petitioner, who alleges that he is restrained of his liberty, and unlawfully imprisoned in the county jail by the sheriff of Oklahoma county, Okla. That the cause of said restraint and imprisonment is by reason of a commitment issued by the court of common pleas of said county, by virtue of an information charging defendant with the crime of violating section 12, chapter 24, article 2, of the 1937 Session Laws, O.S.A., title 59, § 91 et seq.

The above act was enacted for the purpose of regulating and…

2Cases cited48 opinions

  1. Nebbia v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  2. Munn v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  3. A. L. A. Schechter Poultry Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  4. Panama Refining Co. v. RyanSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  5. West Coast Hotel Co. v. ParrishSupreme Court of the United States · 1937

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Hart v. ParhamSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1966
  2. Noble v. DavisSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1942
  3. Bennett v. District Court of Tulsa Co.Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1945
  4. Arnold v. Board of Barber ExaminersNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1941
  5. Ex Parte StrauchCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1945

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API