Lady J. Lingerie, Inc. v. City of Jacksonville
District Court, M.D. Florida
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
SCHLESINGER, District Judge.
This is an action for declaratory and injunctive relief and damages challenging the constitutionality of city zoning ordinances placing certain restrictions on adult entertainment establishments. The stated purpose of the ordinances is to combat the undesirable secondary effects of nude dancing: prostitution, public masturbation, lewd and lascivious conduct, and sexual harassment. Most of the issues in this case can be resolved by the various motions for summary judgmenVdismissal that have been filed in this case. The remaining factual issues were…
2Cases cited47 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Hoffman Estates v. Flipside, Hoffman Estates, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Federal Communications Commission v. Beach Communications, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Members of the City Council of Los Angeles v. Taxpayers for VincentSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Peek-A-Boo Lounge of Bradenton, Inc. v. Manatee CountyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2011
- Lady J. Lingerie, Inc. v. City of JacksonvilleCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1999
- David Vincent, Inc. v. Broward CountyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2000
- Peek-A-Boo Lounge of Bradenton, Inc. v. Manatee CountyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2003
- Webb v. Town Council of Town of HilliardDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2000
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.