Legal Opinion
State v. Pineda-Pineda
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided March 1, 2010No. 61722-2-IPublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
226 P.3d 164 (2010)
STATE of Washington, Respondent,
v.
Eli PINEDA-PINEDA, Appellant.
No. 61722-2-I.
Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 1.
March 1, 2010.
Sheryl Gordon McCloud, Law Offices of Sheryl Gordon McCloud, Seattle, WA, for Appellant.
Trisha Dian Johnson, Skagit County Prosecuting Attorney, Mount Vernon, WA, for Respondent.
APPELWICK, J.
¶ 1 Eli Pineda-Pineda appeals his sentence enhancement for delivery of a controlled substance in a school zone, as authorized by RCW 69.50.435. Because he was convicted of the crime based on accomplice liability and was not physically present in the…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Pinkerton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Iannelli v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Tison v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- State v. GuloyWashington Supreme Court · 1985
- State v. ScottWashington Supreme Court · 1988
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- United States v. Michael BrownCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
- State v. HayesWashington Supreme Court · 2015
- State v. HayesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2013
- State v. AllenCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2014
- United States v. WebbDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2016
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.