Legal Opinion

State v. Hayes

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided November 13, 2013No. 43207-2-IIPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Johanson, A.C. J.

¶1 We are asked to decide whether a major economic offense sentence enhancement may be imposed when the trial court instructed the jury that the underlying conviction could be based on accomplice liability. Because the major economic offense sentence enhancement does not indicate legislative intent to extend the enhancement to accomplices, we vacate the sentence enhancement and remand for resentencing. We also direct the court on remand to correct the judgment and sentence consistent with this opinion.

FACTS

¶2 In May 2009, Larry Alan Hayes went to trial after police found…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. State v. FordWashington Supreme Court · 1999
  2. State v. Silva-BaltazarWashington Supreme Court · 1994
  3. State v. McKimWashington Supreme Court · 1982
  4. State v. StubbsWashington Supreme Court · 2010
  5. State v. StubbsWashington Supreme Court · 2010

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. HayesWashington Supreme Court · 2015
  2. State Of Washington v. Larry Paul WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2015
  3. State of Washington v. Anthony Rene VasquezCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2019
  4. State of Washington v. Jennifer L. WemhoffCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2022
  5. State of Washington v. Travis Lee PadgettCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2019

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API