Legal Opinion

Adams v. Hartford Life & Accident Insurance

District Court, N.D. Georgia

Decided December 16, 2008No. 1:08-cv-02794PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

CHARLES A. PANNELL, JR., District Judge.

This matter is now before the court in regard to discovery issues addressed in the parties’ joint preliminary planning report and discovery schedule [Doc. No. 7], In the planning report, the plaintiff contends that she is entitled to discovery limited only by the usual relevancy issues. The defendant, on the other hand, contends that discovery in this case should be limited to the production of the administrative record, which is comprised of the employee welfare benefit plan (“the Plan”) documents and the plaintiffs claim file.

The court is…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Metropolitan Life Insurance v. GlennSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
  2. Glazer v. Reliance Standard Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2008
  3. Cerrito v. Liberty Life Assurance Co. of BostonDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 2002
  4. Hogan-Cross v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2008
  5. Lake v. Hartford Life & Accident InsuranceDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 2003

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Allen v. Life Insurance Co. of North AmericaDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 2009
  2. Harvey v. Standard InsuranceDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 2011
  3. Finch v. Hillshire Brands Co.District Court, N.D. Alabama · 2015
  4. Smith v. Life Insurance Co. of North AmericaDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API