Finch v. Hillshire Brands Co.
District Court, N.D. Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
C. LYNWOOD SMITH, JR., District Judge.
Plaintiff, Stephen Finch, asserts a single claim for payment of severance benefits pursuant to the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (“ERISA”), 29 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq.1 He named the following defendants: (1) his former employer, The Hillshire Brands Company (“the Company”); (2) Hillshire Brands Severance Pay Plan (“the Plan”), an employee welfare benefit plan established by the Company to provide severance benefits to terminated employees; and (3) The Hill-shire Brands Company Employee Benefits Administrative…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Metropolitan Life Insurance v. GlennSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Olan Jett v. Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Alabama, Inc., Medical Expense PlanCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1989
- Leahy v. Raytheon CorporationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2002
- Marcia Williams v. BellSouth TelecommunicationsCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2004
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Shanklin v. United Mine Workers of America Combined Benefit FundDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 2023