O'Bryan v. Ford Motor Co.
District Court, S.D. Florida
1Opinion of the Court
FINAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT
JAMES LAWRENCE KING, District Judge.
THIS CAUSE comes before the Court upon Defendant Ford Motor Company’s Amended Motion for Final Summary Judgment, or in the Alternative, Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (DE 190), filed March 7, 2014. The Court has been fully briefed on the matter.1 For the reasons cited herein, the Court finds that Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment should be granted.
1. INTRODUCTION
This is an action in strict product liability and negligence against Ford Motor Company (“Defendant”) claiming an allegedly defective speed control deactivation…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Allen v. Tyson Foods, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1997
- West v. Caterpillar Tractor Company, Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 1976
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Gardner v. Ford Motor Co.District Court, M.D. Florida · 2015
- Baker v. Fiat Chrysler Automobiles US LLC (FCA US LLC)District Court, N.D. Alabama · 2024
- Johnson v. Capital One Services, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2019
- Ronald Fronckowiak, as an individual, and as Personal Representative of the Estate of Felix Fronckowiak, deceased, and Rebecca Jaeger, an individual v. Kia America, Inc., a California corporationDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 2026