Legal Opinion
United States v. Tana
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided October 7, 1985No. 85 Cr. 608 (GLG)PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
GOETTEL, District Judge:
The defendant, Ronald Tana (“Tana”), moves to dismiss his indictment, pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(2), for failure to allege conduct constituting a crime. For the reasons stated below, the motion is granted.
For purposes of this motion, the factual allegations of the indictment are accepted as true. United States v. Napolitano, 552 F.Supp. 465, 473 (S.D.N.Y.1982). During July 1980, Tana and his associates converted the window production equipment and raw materials of Yonkers Plate Glass, Inc. and its subsidiary Fedentrol, Inc. (collectively “YPG”). With the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Broadrick v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Hoffman Estates v. Flipside, Hoffman Estates, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- United States v. George E. Girard, Jr., Paul A. LambertCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1979
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- United States v. Sheldon I. MatzkinCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1994
- United States v. Thomas J. FaustCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
- United States v. Kathy KlinglerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1995
- United States v. Jerome HowardCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
- United States v. Francis Anthony Littriello, United States of America v. Michael Paul TurnerCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1989
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.