Legal Opinion

Sequa Coatings Corp. v. Northern Indiana Commuter Transportation District

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided December 18, 2003No. 64A05-0305-CV-248PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION ON REHEARING

BARNES, Judge.

We grant Sequa's petition for rehearing for the limited purpose of clarifying one issue, and we affirm our original opinion. Sequa argues that we should grant rehearing because it properly designated evidence in support of its response to NICTD's motion for summary judgment.1 *928Even if Sequa properly designated evidence in support of its response to NICTD's motion for summary judgment, as it asserts in its petition, and we were to construe the evidence in the light most favorable to it, it has not set forth facts showing genuine issues for trial. Sequa's…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Ramon v. Glenroy Const. Co., Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1993
  2. McMahan v. Snap on Tool Corp.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1985
  3. Strong v. JacksonIndiana Court of Appeals · 2003
  4. Beaver, Dorothy v. Grand Prix KartingCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2001
  5. Sequa Coatings Corp. v. Northern Indiana Commuter Transportation DistrictIndiana Court of Appeals · 2003

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Constable v. NORTHGLENN, LLCSupreme Court of Colorado · 2011
  2. Axis Insurance Company v. American Specialty Insurance & Risk ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2024
  3. James T. Mitchell v. 10th and the Bypass, LLC, and Elway, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API